Week 3 - An AI's take on Surfing the Tsunami

     


    



    In a first for me, I will utilize ChatGPT to write the entirety of one of my blog posts. It feels less like a skill and more like using a tool designed for an imbecile. It's the difference between actually writing code and using a no-code tool; using a calculator rather than pencil and paper. I am criticizing it as a tool, but I criticize using it as a catch all. There is a reason we make kids learn the fundamental basics of math before giving them a calculator. 

    Regardless, I asked ChatGPT the following prompt:


    I have asked ChatGPT to write this blogpost because if you do not take my criticisms of Surfing the Tsunami's premise and outlook on AI seriously, you might be inclined to take AI's criticism more seriously. Generally, I agree with ChatGPT on the majority of its points and before I digress too much I will simply copy and paste ChatGPT's response.

    In "Surfing the Tsunami," Todd Kelsey delves into the profound impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the job market, urging readers to take immediate and serious action. While the book provides a thorough exploration of AI's potential disruptions, it also has several areas that could benefit from refinement. Here, we offer a balanced critique, highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of Kelsey's work.

ChatGPT's Critique of Chapter 3

    Kelsey excels at providing a broad spectrum of perspectives on AI's impact. He categorizes viewpoints into optimists, pessimists, and realists, encouraging readers to explore all angles. This inclusive approach helps readers form a well-rounded understanding of the issue. The book's persistent emphasis on taking action is commendable. Kelsey doesn't just inform readers about the potential impacts of AI; he urges them to adapt, adopt, and become adept in AI technologies. This proactive stance is crucial in today's rapidly changing job landscape.

    Kelsey offers a wealth of resources, including articles, studies, and websites, for readers to further their understanding. This resource-rich approach adds practical value to the book, making it a useful tool for those looking to dive deeper into the subject. By discussing the views of optimists, pessimists, and realists, Kelsey ensures that the discussion is balanced. He acknowledges the potential benefits of AI, such as increased efficiency and new job creation, while also addressing the significant risks, including job displacement and economic inequality.

    One of the book's major drawbacks is its repetitive nature. Kelsey repeatedly stresses the importance of taking action, which, while essential, becomes monotonous. This could potentially disengage readers who grasp the urgency early on and are looking for more nuanced insights as they progress through the book. Although Kelsey provides a broad overview, the book often lacks deep, critical analysis of the data presented. For instance, while there are numerous references to studies and articles, the book could benefit from a more detailed examination of the methodologies and assumptions behind these studies. This would enhance the credibility and depth of the arguments.

    While individual action is important, Kelsey's focus on what readers can do personally might overshadow the need for systemic and policy-level changes. Addressing AI's impact requires not just personal adaptation but also significant shifts in education, legislation, and corporate practices. A more balanced discussion on these fronts would be beneficial. Despite presenting multiple perspectives, there is a subtle optimistic bias in Kelsey's writing. His belief in the potential for individuals and societies to adapt may overlook the significant structural challenges and resistance that often accompany technological shifts. A more critical look at these barriers would provide a more realistic picture.

    Some of the solutions proposed, such as learning more about AI and advocating for its adoption, can seem overly simplistic given the complexity of the issues at hand. The book could benefit from more detailed strategies and examples of successful adaptations at both individual and organizational levels.

    Surfing the Tsunami is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the impact of AI on the job market. Todd Kelsey's passionate call to action and comprehensive resource list make it a useful starting point. However, the book's repetitive messaging, lack of in-depth analysis, and optimistic bias somewhat dilute its effectiveness. For readers seeking a deeper, more critical exploration of AI's implications, supplementary readings may be necessary. Nonetheless, Kelsey's work succeeds in highlighting the urgency of the issue and encouraging proactive engagement with AI technologies.

    ChatGPT was actually never given the name of the Author and most of these points are reiterated reviews on Amazon. Most of this analysis likely originated from Amazon or from its GoodReads description. I think it could be more pointed at the Chapter, as I only fed it the Chapter, but it is enough that most would be happy with this analysis.

    For reference, you can find the Amazon reviews here: Surfing the Tsunami: An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Options for Responding: Kelsey, Todd: 9781976756344: Amazon.com: Books

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1 - Why AI?

Image
           In chapter one of the book, Surfing the Tsunami , by Todd Kelsey, we are introduced to his background and life and how he came to know artificial intelligence. I think the opening Chapter is a rather superficial and surface level understanding of AI and why we should pay attention to it. This is not to discredit its importance or Todd's story of how he came to know about it but having grown up between the analog and digital world and having friends that work in all types of sectors I think his base assumptions are wrong.      For example, consider the following quote: "It’s probably safe to say that the field of artificial intelligence is in its early stages; ultimately the goal of artificial intelligence is to explore how far computers can be taken to simulate human intelligence, or potentially to exceed human intelligence" (Kelsey Surfing the tsunami p. 10). Artificial intelligence, as a real research field has been around since at least the 1940's when t
Read more

AI and Modern Marketing

Image
      Marketing is a broad term that seems to refer to the concept of influencing a set of consumers into soliciting a good or service. Marketing, in some form, has probably been around since the beginning of history; we could consider evolutionary marketing where partners of opposite sex "market" their availability and prowess in different forms. For example, in humans we market our availability and prowess or compatibility to a partner verbally through flirting or in the ways we dress. This is just a simple example, but marketing as a field of business has likely also been around since humans have been offering goods or services.      As crude as it may seem, but the world's oldest profession, prostitution, is just an extension of the evolutionary marketing into business marketing in a way (Parsons 2005). Modern marketing has developed to take advantage of our developed evolutionary marketing and while most cannot agree on when or where modern marketing has its origins,
Read more

What can't AI do?

Image
      Going by the picture above it certainly struggles a fair amount with creating words in images. These artifacts or strange portions of an AI's work such as a person having more than five fingers or just not generating the correct image at all are known as hallucinations. In my last post, I pointed out that machine learning models have a theoretical limit to what they can learn. Although I want to be clear that not all AI is machine learning, but all machine learning is AI as machine learning is a subset of AI that uses neural networks to learn.     Recently, Computerphile, a lovely YouTube channel interviewed Dr. Mike Pound at the University of Nottingham about a new paper that came out about whether or not generative AI has already peaked or rather the possibility that we will get further and further diminishing returns.     I will not go in depth over the video as you can watch it for yourself nor in depth over the paper, but I would like to pull a few graphs from the paper
Read more